pumping schedule

Editorial standards

Every piece of content on Pumping Schedule is researched, written, and reviewed with the same care we'd want for our own families. Here's how — in detail.

Our approved source list

Pumping is health-adjacent. Mothers make real decisions — how many sessions per day, when to drop a pump, whether a supply dip is normal — based on what they read here. That means the bar for sourcing is higher than a typical parenting site, and it should be.

Every factual claim on this site links to at least one source from this whitelist:

Mommy blogs, social media posts, and sponsored content are not sources. Neither are secondhand summaries of guidelines (we go to the original publication). If a claim can't be traced to one of the organizations above or a peer-reviewed study, it stays out. No exceptions — even when the information sounds right, even when "everyone knows" it.

How an article gets made

Articles don't start as drafts. They start as questions — usually the kind that showed up in our own search history at 2 AM. Here's the actual process:

  1. Topic selection.We look at what pumping mothers are actively searching for, what the top-ranking results cover, and — more importantly — what they miss. A topic gets greenlit when there's a real information gap and we can fill it with sourced material.
  2. Research. Source material comes from the approved whitelist above. We read the full publication, not an abstract or a blog post summarizing it. If a guideline is ambiguous or has been updated, we check the most recent version and note the date.
  3. Drafting.Articles target an 8th-grade reading level (Flesch-Kincaid). Short paragraphs. Clear headings. Answer-first structure — if you're reading one-handed at 3 AM, you should find the answer in the first sentence of the relevant section, not buried in paragraph four.
  4. Citation placement.Every factual claim links directly to its source. Minimum 3 authoritative citations per article. We never group citations at the bottom in a generic "Sources" section — they go inline, next to the claim they support, so you can verify without scrolling.
  5. Review. A separate pass for medical accuracy, readability, and completeness. Does this match current guidelines? Would a first-time pumper understand this without prior context? Is anything missing that a reader would reasonably expect?
  6. Publish + monitoring. Published articles show a publish date and a last-updated date. When guidelines change (the AAP last updated its breastfeeding policy in June 2022), we go back and update every affected article. Nothing published here stays static forever.

Readability standards

Our audience is exhausted. Sleep-deprived. Often reading on a phone with one hand while holding a pump flange with the other. Content decisions flow from that reality:

  • 8th-grade reading level (Flesch-Kincaid) — no jargon without definition
  • Answer-first paragraphs — the main point comes before the explanation
  • Tables for schedules, not paragraphs of numbers
  • FAQ sections for common follow-up questions (snippet-optimized for Google)
  • One idea per paragraph — no dense multi-point blocks
  • Active voice, second person ("you" not "one should")

If an article requires medical terminology (autocrine regulation, prolactin, FIL), we define it the first time it appears in plain language. We don't dumb things down — we make them accessible. There's a difference.

What you won't find here

Medical advice.This site is educational and informational. Always consult your healthcare provider, lactation consultant, or pediatrician for personal medical decisions. We present what the research says — we don't tell you what to do with it for your specific situation.

Sponsored content or paid placements.No brand pays for mention in our articles. When we name a product (Spectra S1, Medela Pump In Style), it's because it's relevant to the topic — not because someone paid us to include it. We have no affiliate agreements with any pump manufacturer.

Sensational or fear-based framing.Pumping is hard enough without someone telling you you're doing it wrong or that your supply is "in danger." We present information calmly. Where something is urgent (don't skip the MOTN pump in the first 12 weeks), we explain why — we don't just scare you into compliance.

Fake credentials.The team behind this site are researchers and writers, not doctors or IBCLCs. That distinction matters, and you'll never see us blur it. We don't use white-coat stock photos. We don't invent "medical review" processes that don't exist. When we say "editorial team," that's exactly what it is.

Conflict of interest disclosure

Pumping Schedule is a privately funded project. Revenue comes from the (upcoming) subscription app — not from ads, affiliate links, or sponsored articles. No pump manufacturer, formula company, or supplement brand has editorial influence over this site.

If that ever changes — if we add affiliate links, accept sponsored content, or take brand partnerships — it will be disclosed clearly on the affected page and noted here. As of today: zero conflicts.

Corrections and updates

We take errors seriously. If you find an outdated guideline, a broken citation link, a factual error, or something that reads misleadingly — tell us. Every report gets reviewed within 48 hours.

  • Minor corrections(broken links, typos, date errors): fixed and the "last updated" date advances.
  • Factual corrections (a guideline changed, a number was wrong): the article is updated with a visible note explaining what changed and why.
  • Guideline updates (AAP, CDC, or ACOG releases new recommendations): all affected articles are reviewed and updated within one week of publication.

Report errors to contact@pumpingschedule.com with the page URL and what looks wrong. We respond within 2 business days.

Back to home · About us · Browse pumping schedules

Track every pump session

Get the free app